I am glad observe eHarmony reacting within their formal weblog to articles titled “Marriage-Maker states tend to be Tied in Knots ” through the Wall Street diary. The WSJ post examines many of the wedding stats circulated by dating sites like eHarmony and the strategy always determine these types of data. We talked a bit concerning this subject besides, a couple of weeks ago once the original WSJ post was actually published (see tale).
The WSJ article failed to aim to kindly about stats introduced by internet dating sites, and for the many part I agree with the author. The public needs to know how these research are created. Of the many internet dating sites pointed out in the WSJ post, “eHarmony stands out as among much more mindful types”. That isn’t just a glowing report for eHarmony thus, they decided to publish an answer on the web log.
For the eHarmony blog post they’re going into more information on the way they calculated that their particular dating internet site was accountable for 2percent of marriages in the United States, from 12-month duration ending March 2007. All of the info we already understood about from a previously introduced PDF file named “eHarmony | Harris involved 2007 Marriage Metrics many eHarmony Marriages” (see Story), but the post really does remove some more details. Just what this web site article really does program is, eHarmony is attempting to be as open and clear along with their research results as is possible. I believe the name “start correspondence” may undoubtedly end up being the ideal choice for all the formal eHarmony weblog.
Here’s the full eHarmony a reaction to the Wall Street diary on how they assess their unique marriage research. For further information about this dating site, study the report on eHarmony.